References

Other formats

This information is also available in the following format:

Anderson EE. (2006) A qualitative study of non-affiliated non-scientist Institutional Review board members, Accountability in Research, 13: 135-155.

Anderson W. (1990) A new approach to regulating the use of animals in science. Bioethics, 4:45-54.

Council of Europe (1986) European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. ETC 123.

Cross N., Pines MK., Rogers LJ. (2004) Saliva sampling to assess cortisol levels in unrestrained common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 62: 107-114.

Dawkins, MS. (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 21: 77-82

Dyer S. (2004) Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees. Health & Place, 10: 339-348

Homes, KA., Paull, MD., Birrell AM., Hennessy A., Gillin AG., Horvath, JS. (1996) A unique design for ease of access and movement of captive Papio hamadryas. Laboratory Animals 30: 327-331.

NHMRC (2002) Statement on Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

NHMRC (2003) Policy on the Care and Use of Non-human Primates.

NHMRC (2004) Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

NMHRC and OGTR (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator) (2006) Guidelines for the Generation, Breeding, Care and Use of Genetically Modified and Cloned Animals for Scientific Purposes, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

NHMRC (2008) Guidelines to Promote the Wellbeing of Animals used for Scientific Purposes, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

O,Brien JK., Heffernan, S., Thomson PC., McGreevy, PD. (2008) Effect of positive reinforcement training on physiological and behavioural stress responses in the hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas). Animal Welfare, 17:125-138.

OTA (1986) Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing and Education, Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, Washington DC.

Pines MK., Kaplan G., Rogers LJ. (2007) A note on indoor and outdoor housing preferences of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 108: 348-353.

Rose M. (1996) Striking the balance: the practitioner and the animal ethics committee. ANZCCART News, 9: 1-4.

Schuppli CA., Fraser, D. (2007) Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33: 294-301.

Singer P. (1990) New attitudes needed on animal testing. New Scientist, August 11, 4.

Singer P. (1991) To join or not to join? The dilemma of Animal Experimentation Ethics Committees, The Animal Welfare League News, June, 13.

SSCAW (1989), Report on Animal Experimentation, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

Warnock M. (1984) Scientific research must have a moral basis. New Scientist, November 15, 36.

Previous page | AAWS International Animal Welfare Conference